Residência das Algas / MarchettiBonetti

first_img Brazil “COPY” photographs:  Philippe ArrudaPhotographs:  Philippe ArrudaSave this picture!© Philippe ArrudaRecommended ProductsFiber Cements / CementsULMA Architectural SolutionsPaper Facade Panel in Leioa School RestorationEnclosures / Double Skin FacadesIsland Exterior FabricatorsCurtain Wall Facade SystemsEnclosures / Double Skin FacadesAlucoilStructural Honeycomb Panels – LarcoreFiber Cements / CementsSwisspearlSwisspearl Largo Fiber Cement PanelsText description provided by the architects. From two overlapping volumes, the social and private areas are defined, just as the integration of the living room, barbecue area and kitchen. This house is focused on the interior, and it has an internal garden integrated to the living room. The building is located at the south of the lot on an east-west orientation to make the most of the sunshine. The services and restroom areas face south.Save this picture!Floor PlanThe ground floor has a social function: living room, kitchen and barbecue area are all integrated. In the first floor, the social area is divided by the circulation. In the front part of the house there is the guest room and office; in the back, there is the master bedroom, which has a balcony with garden. The living room has double ceiling height in the central part and articulates the house vertically.Save this picture!© Philippe ArrudaIn the living room, openings in both sides aloud the cross ventilation. The same occurs in the kitchen. In the bedrooms, big openings aloud a optimal utilization of sunlight, specially in the master bedroom. The volume of the house stands out from the other residences in the street, which are very traditional.Save this picture!Floor PlanThe structure is made of reinforced concrete. The front part, over the garage, has a two-meter-cantilever-structure. The stairs are set into the wall, with no side support. The idea was to use the materials in a rawer situation. Exposed concrete is used in some details and there is a lot of wood and glass in the facades. In the ground floor, the porcelain cement is used, both in interior and exterior.Save this picture!© Philippe ArrudaThe balcony in the master bedroom has a daily use, something uncommon for balcony areas. The biggest challenge was to conciliate the client’s original idea with the architects’s style.Save this picture!SectionProject gallerySee allShow lessJardins House / CR2 ArquiteturaSelected ProjectsAD Interviews: Uma AdusumilliInterviews Share Houses Save this picture!© Philippe Arruda+ 17 Share 2012 CopyHouses•Florianópolis, Brazil Residência das Algas / MarchettiBonetti Year:  Residência das Algas / MarchettiBonettiSave this projectSaveResidência das Algas / MarchettiBonetti ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOr Clipboard “COPY” Projects 2012 Year:  ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOr Clipboard Architects: MarchettiBonetti+ Arquitetos Associados Area Area of this architecture project Area:  262 m² Area:  262 m² Year Completion year of this architecture project Photographs ArchDaily CopyAbout this officeMarchettiBonetti+ Arquitetos AssociadosOfficeFollowProductsWoodConcrete#TagsProjectsBuilt ProjectsSelected ProjectsResidential ArchitectureHousesFlorianópolisHousesBrazilPublished on January 07, 2015Cite: “Residência das Algas / MarchettiBonetti” 07 Jan 2015. ArchDaily. Accessed 11 Jun 2021. ISSN 0719-8884Read commentsBrowse the CatalogVentilated / Double Skin FacadeTechnowoodProfile Façade SystemGlassMitrexSolar PanelsMetal PanelsAurubisCopper Alloy: Nordic RoyalFiber Cements / CementsEQUITONEFiber Cement Facade Panel PicturaCultural / PatrimonialIsland Exterior FabricatorsSeptember 11th Memorial Museum Envelope SystemConcreteKrytonSmart ConcreteSignage / Display SystemsGoppionDisplay Case – B-ClassMetal PanelsLorin IndustriesAnodized Aluminum – Stainless Steel FinishesWoodStructureCraftEngineering – Mass TimberWindowspanoramah!®ah!38 – FlexibilityChairsSellexChair – IrinaBathroom FurnitureKaleBathroom Cabinets – ZeroMore products »Read commentsSave世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?是否翻译成中文现有为你所在地区特制的网站?想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?Take me there »✖You’ve started following your first account!Did you know?You’ll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my streamlast_img read more

Allahabad High Court Stays Demolition Of Residential Complex Built Near Ancient Buddhist Monuments

first_imgNews UpdatesAllahabad High Court Stays Demolition Of Residential Complex Built Near Ancient Buddhist Monuments LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK16 Feb 2021 6:07 AMShare This – xThe Allahabad High Court on Monday held a special sitting and stayed the demolition of a residential complex allegedly built in close vicinity of the ancient monuments where Lord Budha attained Nirvana. The concerned Sub-Divisional Magistrate had issued directions for demolition of the Petitioners’ property on Friday, February 12. On being apprised of the same, the…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginThe Allahabad High Court on Monday held a special sitting and stayed the demolition of a residential complex allegedly built in close vicinity of the ancient monuments where Lord Budha attained Nirvana. The concerned Sub-Divisional Magistrate had issued directions for demolition of the Petitioners’ property on Friday, February 12. On being apprised of the same, the Petitioners urgently moved the High Court seeking quashing of the impugned order. Since the Court was to re-open only on Tuesday, a Division Bench comprising of Justices Naheed Ara Moonis and Dinesh Pathak held a special, urgent hearing on Monday based on the orders passed by Chief Justice Govind Mathur on administrative side. The Division Bench heard both the parties and thereafter directed the Petitioner to make a representation before the competent authority. In the meanwhile, it said, the Respondent-authorities are restrained from taking any coercive against the Petitioner. The order stated, “The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioners to approach the competent authority within two weeks from today by making a fresh representation/objection, which shall be considered and decided by the authority concerned in accordance with law within a month, thereafter, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and after conducting survey of the concerned area. For a period of six weeks or till the date of decision taken by the authority concerned, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners by the respondents authorities.” The order was passed on an urgent basis, without calling for the counter and rejoinder affidavits of the concerned parties. The Bench however made it clear that the Respondents shall be at liberty to move a recall application, in case it is found that any facts or details given by the Petitioner are incorrect. Background The Petitioner’s property was said to have been built in violation of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 (AMASR Act). Section 20B of the Act declares the area within 200 meters of every protected monument and archaeological site as Regulated Area and any construction thereof is regulated by the competent authority under the Act. It was alleged in the case at hand that the Petitioner’s property was constructed within 200 meters of the ancient monuments situated in Kushi Nagar district (legendary place where Lord Budha attained Nirvana) and thus, the impugned demolition order was passed. Petitioner’s Arguments The Petitioner raised the following contentions before the Court: The impugned order was passed without giving any opportunity of hearing;A reply/objection to the notice dated January 30, 2021 was submitted on February 12, 2021 but on the same day, the impugned order was passed, without considering the reply/objection;The map of the construction was passed by the competent authority on June 16, 2010 for which no objection was ever raised by the Respondents;Petitioners’ houses/buildings are more than 200 mts. away from the prohibited area of the ancient monuments;Petitioners are residing since more than ten years and the said area has never been declared as prohibited area;The impugned order does not indicate that prior to issuing notice, any enquiry or survey was conducted to find out the exact location of buildings lying in the prohibited area. State’s Arguments The State Government opposed the writ petition, while stating that show cause notice had already been given to the Petitioners in 2010 as well as in 2012, and yet they constructed their buildings/houses in the prohibited area. It was submitted that by way of a notice dated January 30, 2021, an opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners to file reply/objection within 15 days but they failed to reply the same. It was further argued that the power exercised by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate directing the Tehsildar for the demolition of the construction has been delegated by the Archaeological Survey of India. Findings The Division Bench noted that there is no reason to show that the houses of the Petitioners have been constructed within the prohibited area. It noted, “even the residence of all the persons in the notice have not been shown. In a casual manner, the impugned order dated 12.2.2021 has been passed in haste directing the Tehsildar to get remove the construction of the buildings/houses without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners which is against the principles of natural justice.” Related News The Allahabad High Court recently issued notice on a petition alleging encroachments at an Archaeological site at Kushi Nagar where Lord Buddha attained Nirvāṇa. The Court had also sought a working report along with necessary photographs of the site. The matter is listed for hearing on February 22, 2021. Case Title: Noorjahan & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. Click Here To Download Order Read OrderSubscribe to LiveLaw, enjoy Ad free version and other unlimited features, just INR 599 Click here to Subscribe. All payment options available.loading….Next Storylast_img read more